Tag: install

I have six computers of different sizes and specs, but lately I’ve noticed that I use my Chromebook more frequently. It has one amazing feature that I can’t live without, despite its obviously poor performance and small 11-inch footprint: full-fledged Android app support. I’m not just saying this because I write for Android Authority; having access to smartphone apps that don’t have a true PC equivalent is revolutionary.

Unfortunately, earlier this year Microsoft ended the Windows Subsystem for Android (WSA) experiment, which enabled the use of Android apps on Windows 11. Additionally, Phone Link is still in use, although it just lets you mirror the screen of your smartphone. Furthermore, the Pixel and the great majority of other devices still do not have screen sharing enabled by Microsoft. Therefore, I have to decide between using an emulator or a Chrome OS device if I want the finest Android experience on my PC.

The sole issue? At best, Android emulators on PC provide a mediocre experience. Performance is lost due to emulation costs, and even the best Android emulators, such as BlueStacks, have crowded interfaces and advertisements designed for particular applications, like gaming. On Chrome OS, however, the experience is far more seamless: you may open individual Android apps, and they coexist peacefully with native apps.

Is it possible to accomplish this Android-PC harmony without installing Chrome OS and forfeiting the ability to use a conventional desktop environment? Yes, but the only catch is that Linux is needed. Nevertheless, I believe it’s totally worth it, and Microsoft’s growing hostility against Windows privacy is just one more reason to think about switching.

Why running Android apps on PC matters more than ever

I enjoy having access to Android’s extensive app store on my PC for a number of reasons, including my investing portfolio tracker and other smart home apps. I frequently think that Android services are simply superior to their web or PC versions. For instance, WhatsApp for PC keeps me from scaling the window to my preferred size. In particular, it feels like a needless waste of screen space because it won’t shrink any smaller than a quarter of my screen.

Apps for smartphones, on the other hand, are made to fit on almost any screen size. Therefore, the window size should be much more adjustable if you can figure out how to run them on a computer. Additionally, you may already understand the appeal if you have ever tried multitasking on a computer with a single display.

Try using a web browser to launch Google Maps and minimizing the window size (see below). As soon as you click on a business, the sidebar will occupy all of the available space, leaving you with nothing except the search box. Without ignoring this sidebar, you are unable to move about the map.

You can see how much smaller the windows for the Android versions of WhatsApp and Google Maps can get on the right. This discrepancy is not the fault of Meta or any other developer; desktop applications are made to work on reasonable screen sizes, and my smaller windows don’t precisely meet that requirement.

Nevertheless, the difference is clearly noticeable on a 24-inch screen, such as the monitor on my gaming PC. I’ve considered purchasing a second monitor, but my desk isn’t large enough to fit one. I must therefore use every available inch of screen real estate for the time being. Aside from density considerations, I occasionally like mobile apps because of their simple user interfaces. For instance, AI mobile apps respond far more quickly than the web version, which is useful when I only need a brief response to a small query.

Because of my propensity for multitasking, I usually find myself using two chat apps (WhatsApp and Telegram) in addition to a full-featured web browser and possibly one other program, such as Maps or a social media app like X/Twitter. Normally, switching between the different full-screen windows would require a lot of Alt+Tab. However, with top-notch Android app support, I can use many windows simultaneously.

Android apps on PC without emulation

I came found Waydroid, an open source project that lets you run Android apps on a PC. Waydroid doesn’t simulate a whole Android device in a virtual machine, in contrast to Android emulators like BlueStacks or Genymotion, which you may already be familiar with. Rather, it shares the host OS’s kernel and makes use of Linux namespaces. In summary, it runs an entire Android system directly on Linux using a container-based methodology. This results in near-native performance with no overhead or performance penalty associated with virtualization.

Admittedly, installing Waydroid is more complicated than just downloading the installer for an emulator and repeatedly selecting Next, as is the case with Windows. However, it merely required entering two simple commands into the terminal, and Waydroid is available in the app stores of many distributions. It wasn’t a problem for me because I already use Linux on a daily basis, but I would advise you to give the operating system a try if you haven’t used it recently. Stable versions, such as Ubuntu, are largely similar to Windows and require no tweaking.

Returning to the topic of Waydroid, there are two builds available: one with Google apps (GApps) and one without. I chose the former, which included a minimum build of Android 13 based on LineageOS along with the Play Store and Google Play Services framework.

After installation, Waydroid displays installed Android apps in the application menu of your computer, complete with taskbar entries and unique icons, just like native programs. Additionally, you may enable multi-window mode, which lets each program open in a separate window, by changing one setting.

Is using Waydroid pleasant?

Despite being an open-source, community-built program, Waydroid feels quite well-designed. With the exception of a few configurable configuration changes (such as turning off the on-screen keyboard), the main experience is identical to that of an Android tablet. I can use my monitor without even using my keyboard and mouse because it allows touch input.

I was pleasantly happy to discover that practically every software I wanted to run on Waydroid worked without any issues, despite my initial concerns about compatibility. You must first take a moment to register your Waydroid installation with Google Play Protect, but I could download everything from the Play Store. Of course, you may also utilize other app stores like F-Droid or sideload apps. Compared to Windows Subsystem for Android, which was formally restricted to the Amazon App Store, this is already a significant improvement.

We tested all of my favorite apps, including Telegram, YouTube, and Google Maps, and they all functioned perfectly without a single frame loss. Even my Chromebook, which runs Android apps less effectively, stands in sharp contrast to this. You see, with the release of Chrome OS 109 in 2023, Google shifted to a virtualization-based strategy for running Android. Since then, a lot of Chromebooks with lower specs have had trouble running Android apps.

The term “way” alludes to Waydroid, a crucial part of the graphics infrastructure of contemporary Linux that enables even hardware acceleration and fluid input. Even though I have AMD hardware, as the project suggests, I tested a few simple games and they ran perfectly. Allowing Waydroid to utilize your PC’s built-in graphics or switching to software rendering are two workarounds for NVIDIA’s lack of official support.

That’s not to imply that Waydroid doesn’t have drawbacks. You’ll soon discover that you can’t view incoming notifications when you run programs in multi-window mode. Apps lack the ability to send notifications outside of the container they reside in, in contrast to Chrome OS. If you install the appropriate desktop application and use a forwarding app, such as KDE Connect, you can easily get around this.

Additionally, Waydroid shields a large portion of your device’s hardware from Android apps. For example, the camera input is broken, which is really important if you care about video calls. Similarly, apps are inherently unable to directly access Bluetooth or GPS. However, this only truly matters in ancillary use scenarios, such as when attempting to configure a smart home device straight from Waydroid.

Overall, Waydroid fills the void better than anything else available at the moment, although it doesn’t completely replace my Pixel or even my detachable Chromebook. I can highly recommend Waydroid if you’re among the numerous folks who either use an emulator or wish that Windows Subsystem for Android would come back.